Executive Summary
ENTRY required a sovereign, deterministic trust layer embedded at the infrastructure level to enable identity without PII exposure, network-wide compliance logic, standardized attestation governance, explainable AI aligned to protocol controls, and deterministic enforcement at scale. Zekret’s architecture was deployed as a Layer-1 trust substrate, powering network-wide governance and interoperability.
The Challenge
- Identity without PII: network needed trust across applications without handling or distributing personal data.
- Compliance at network scale: rules had to be deterministic, universal, version-controlled, and enforceable.
- Sovereign, explainable AI: models required strict governance, constraints, and local execution.
- No shared trust fabric: developers needed attestations, eligibility indicators, enforcement primitives, and AI insights without data sharing.
- Ecosystem interoperability: apps needed to trust each other’s outcomes without exposing identity or compliance data.
Why Zekret Was Selected
- ✔ Identity governance without PII
- ✔ Deterministic, universal compliance logic
- ✔ Policy Packs for network-wide standardization
- ✔ Sovereign, explainable AI aligned to infrastructure constraints
- ✔ Minimal-disclosure interoperability between applications
- ✔ Real-time enforcement primitives at network scale
- ✔ Fully sovereign deployment within ENTRY
Implementation Overview
- Identity Credentialing Layer: device-bound, attestation-based credentials with minimal disclosure; no personal data on-chain or shared.
- Policy Engine as Network Service: Policy Packs for eligibility, sanctions, jurisdictional rules, risk logic, and app-specific requirements—deterministic and shared by all applications.
- Screening & Risk Intelligence: non-PII sanctions, risk categories, behavioral flags, counterparty evaluation, jurisdictional eligibility—consumable as compliance-state outputs.
- Federated AI Governance Engine: explainable, policy-constrained AI running in sovereign nodes; deterministic augmentation for compliance and decision-making.
- Deterministic Enforcement Layer: protocol-level primitives for onboarding eligibility, transaction gating, access rights, cross-application permissions; immutable off-chain logs with no PII.
Architecture Used
- Identity Layer: device-bound credentialing, selective disclosure, structured attestations.
- Compliance Intelligence Layer: non-PII sanctions and risk-state evaluation.
- Policy Engine: universal Policy Packs for network-wide compliance.
- AI Governance Layer: explainable, sovereign AI constrained by policy.
- Enforcement Layer: Allow/Block/Escalate primitives with immutable logging.
- Integration Model: applications consume services via ENTRY’s internal interface; no protocol-level PII.
Outcomes & Impact
- ↳ Network-wide identity verification without data sharing
- ↳ Uniform compliance logic across all ecosystem applications
- ↳ Sovereign, explainable AI for compliant decision support
- ↳ Increased interoperability; easier cross-app trust
- ↳ Faster onboarding and safer user actions via sub-second evaluations
- ↳ Zero PII footprint across the L1 environment
Metrics (Anonymized)
Millions of users supported by network-level identity governance
Hundreds of applications relying on unified compliance logic
<1 second deterministic policy evaluation
0 PII processed at the protocol or application layer
High-throughput enforcement suitable for L1-scale activity
